The following letter was mailed to the chairman of the board of trustees of the ERLC, with copies sent to the trustee from Missouri (my state), and Dr. Russell Moore on December 2, 2014. The letter included my mailing address, email address, and cell phone number. I believe my letter is polite, concise, and raises fair questions. Yet, to date, I have had no response. I post it here with the belief that no Southern Baptist who reaches out to a trustee in a respectful manner should be ignored. I leave it to the reader to determine if my concerns are valid:
I am writing this letter to express concerns with the
direction of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission under the leadership
of Russell Moore, and to get some clarity on some matters.
My specific concerns are as follows:
1) Dr. Moore recently took part in an ecumenical
event at the Vatican, participating with Catholics,
Mormons, Buddhists, Hindus, and other leaders of various cults and false religions.
I believe this to be a clear violation of 2 Corinthians 6:14-18. Some will say it was for a good cause, and Dr. Moore spoke a good word. I would contend that the ends do not justify the means, and Moore’s very presence at this event lends
credibility to these aberrant groups.
2) Dr. Moore recently stated at the ERLC
National Conference that while he would not attend
a gay wedding, he would attend a gay wedding shower or reception.
According to Moore, it would not be
right to support the wedding vows, but it would be appropriate to show
love and support for the couple at a corresponding event. I find Moore’s
position to be both illogical and
troubling. Can one really separate the reception
from the wedding itself? Is one not
a continuation of the other?
Furthermore, when Moore was asked if a Christian
family should allow one of its members to bring their same-sex partner home with them for the holidays and share a bed,
Moore was ambiguous in his answer, stating there
should be no “strict rule” as to how a family handles this situation. Sadly, this position
is nothing short of compromise.
4) It appears the ERLC is taking on a decidedly
“moderate” position on various social issues,
ranging from interaction with the LGBT movement, to immigration reform, to environmentalism. If this is an accurate observation, I believe
it is in contrast to the convictions
of the majority of rank and file Southern Baptists.
Regarding the concerns expressed above, I would like some
clarity in terms of the role of trustees of the ERLC. To what degree are the trustees involved in
the establishment of positions on public policy? When Dr. Moore states the SBC position on any
of the issues mentioned above, is he acting unilaterally? Or do the trustees serve as a “filter” before
those positions are rolled out? I would also
specifically like to know, when Dr. Moore made the decision to take part in the
event at the Vatican, did the trustees approve this decision, or did he make it
on his own? In general, can you explain
to me the process of oversight/accountability offered by the trustees of the
ERLC?